Housing options for low-income California individuals are thin. Without the financial means to provide both a security deposit and first month's rent and/or without sufficient credit history to qualify for tenancy, low-income individuals face challenging circumstances when making housing decisions. Many times, individuals and families are forced to consider residential hotels and motels. Some of these hotels and motels are decent options. Unfortunately, others are operated illegally and violate the rights of California residents.
Unfortunately, sexual harassment remains prevalent in workplaces across California. Bringing an action against an employer/supervisor based on harassing conduct typically comes in two forms:
I just concluded a three-day jury trial a couple months ago. My client was the victim of sexual harassment in the workplace. After over a year of litigation, we took our case to trial. We won and my client was awarded monetary damages, as well as post-judgment awards constituting reimbursement of attorneys fees and costs incurred.
An interpleader action aims to determine the party who is entitled to receive money or property when a neutral third party is holding funds or property and is confronted with two or more claimants to the same money or property. The interpleader action allows for the neutral third party, or “stakeholder,” to avoid liability to any of the claimants by forcing the claimants to litigate among themselves and let the Court determine who deserves what.
My intention in writing this post is not to stoke up another debate over the current real estate debacle in California. I do not intend to spark once again the philosophical wrangling between homeowners and their lenders. I am a lawyer, not a radio talk-show host (yes, there is a difference). I take this opportunity to present the options available to a homeowner who has fallen victim to a "wrongful foreclosure."